Witness the past! | Glimpse the future!
This made me very happy.

In my younger years I was into Iron Man, big time. Then as now, if I had to read superhero comics then the less powerful they were the better. Flawed, troubled, weakened, limited heroes make for better stories. And they don't come much more FTWL than Tony Stark.
When we first encounter him he's fiscally secure but morally bankrupt, selling weapons to fuel the American war in SE Asia (in the forth-coming movie that'll be the Middle East). A shrapnel wound necessitates an improvised mobile life-support system (as pictured), which in time becomes the more finessed suit of armour that serves as his heroic alias.
Iron Man is perhaps the least healthy superhero ever conceived. Following his initial injury, Stark fell victim to depression, developed full-blown alcoholism, succumbed to a heart attack and after recovering was shot by a disgruntled ex-girlfriend, shattering his spine and leaving him in a wheelchair. Like the original invention that saved his shredded torso, he invented a spinal replacement that gave him the use of his legs back but left him vulnerable to a degenerative nerve disease that eventually left him pretty much dead from the brain down.
On top of this, the multi-millionaire industrialist has enjoyed all the excesses that lifestyle entails, most especially serial womanising (see above). His moral complexity also marks him out as almost unique in comics. Neither a brooding anti-hero nor a paragon of virtue, Stark is probably best described as believing in the law more than in justice. In his time he's been made US secretary of defence and director of a counter-espionage agency, and currently (under the auspices of writer Brian Michael Bendis) he's been revealed as one of a small group of "Illuminati" who pretty much run the world. His hard-line adherence to government policy has seen him spearhead an initiative to create a registered police force of superheroes.
But all that went over my head as a kid. I just liked the dashing moustachioed guy in the red and gold tin suit, and all the gimmicks... The "uni-beam" in his chest, the "repulsor rays" in his gauntlets ("The further they go, the harder they hit!").
The affair began in the pages of the UK TransFormers comic. Although markedly better than its US counterpart, with more mature writing and often quite painterly artwork, the magazine was still a glorified toy catalogue. It was always a two-hander, however, and the "B" strip was generally reprints of Amercian Marvel strips with a robot/scifi motif: Steve Ditko's Machine Man; Mike Mignola's Rocket Raccoon; the woeful Spitfire and the Troubleshooters; and of course Iron Man. I can still vividly remember Barry Windsor Smith's work in the surreal, maudlin Iron Man of 2020 and an absolutely gorgeous story Ken Steacy illustrated that had Tony facing a gaggle of traditionally Spider-Man villains. I can still picture a sequence in which a stool pigeon is shaken down by Iron Man in an el-train. After he flies off, the weasel, breathless, collapses against a pole, not realising it's one of Doctor Octopus' mechanical tentacles. Cut to the exterior of the train as it rattles off into the night, and the stoolie's screams...
Having described this shambling, whisky-soaked, depressive yet charismatic wreck of a hero, the casting of Robert Downey Jr. in the title role in the movie seems a master stroke. Can't wait!

In my younger years I was into Iron Man, big time. Then as now, if I had to read superhero comics then the less powerful they were the better. Flawed, troubled, weakened, limited heroes make for better stories. And they don't come much more FTWL than Tony Stark.
When we first encounter him he's fiscally secure but morally bankrupt, selling weapons to fuel the American war in SE Asia (in the forth-coming movie that'll be the Middle East). A shrapnel wound necessitates an improvised mobile life-support system (as pictured), which in time becomes the more finessed suit of armour that serves as his heroic alias.
Iron Man is perhaps the least healthy superhero ever conceived. Following his initial injury, Stark fell victim to depression, developed full-blown alcoholism, succumbed to a heart attack and after recovering was shot by a disgruntled ex-girlfriend, shattering his spine and leaving him in a wheelchair. Like the original invention that saved his shredded torso, he invented a spinal replacement that gave him the use of his legs back but left him vulnerable to a degenerative nerve disease that eventually left him pretty much dead from the brain down.
On top of this, the multi-millionaire industrialist has enjoyed all the excesses that lifestyle entails, most especially serial womanising (see above). His moral complexity also marks him out as almost unique in comics. Neither a brooding anti-hero nor a paragon of virtue, Stark is probably best described as believing in the law more than in justice. In his time he's been made US secretary of defence and director of a counter-espionage agency, and currently (under the auspices of writer Brian Michael Bendis) he's been revealed as one of a small group of "Illuminati" who pretty much run the world. His hard-line adherence to government policy has seen him spearhead an initiative to create a registered police force of superheroes.
But all that went over my head as a kid. I just liked the dashing moustachioed guy in the red and gold tin suit, and all the gimmicks... The "uni-beam" in his chest, the "repulsor rays" in his gauntlets ("The further they go, the harder they hit!").
The affair began in the pages of the UK TransFormers comic. Although markedly better than its US counterpart, with more mature writing and often quite painterly artwork, the magazine was still a glorified toy catalogue. It was always a two-hander, however, and the "B" strip was generally reprints of Amercian Marvel strips with a robot/scifi motif: Steve Ditko's Machine Man; Mike Mignola's Rocket Raccoon; the woeful Spitfire and the Troubleshooters; and of course Iron Man. I can still vividly remember Barry Windsor Smith's work in the surreal, maudlin Iron Man of 2020 and an absolutely gorgeous story Ken Steacy illustrated that had Tony facing a gaggle of traditionally Spider-Man villains. I can still picture a sequence in which a stool pigeon is shaken down by Iron Man in an el-train. After he flies off, the weasel, breathless, collapses against a pole, not realising it's one of Doctor Octopus' mechanical tentacles. Cut to the exterior of the train as it rattles off into the night, and the stoolie's screams...
Having described this shambling, whisky-soaked, depressive yet charismatic wreck of a hero, the casting of Robert Downey Jr. in the title role in the movie seems a master stroke. Can't wait!
- Where is that idiot?:Avengers Mansion
- How's the idiot?:Iron-ic
- What's that idiot listening to?:Tom gettin' ready to fling some garbage right back at me


Comments
Downey of course is a great choice. I wonder who else was on that list of possibles. I know Timothy Dalton's horrid, but if you could just take his look from The Rocketeer and put Gary Oldman in charge of the acting ability via a complex R.C. system, I think we'd be oh-so-good on that one.
Did you hear Edward Norton's recently been cast as the second Hulk? I'm excited, but then, I stand up for the Fantastic Four 2 trailer (Surfer. C'mon.). That one doesn't look like it'll be GOOD, but it can't really be much worse than the first. I think it'll be an upturn.
AAAAAAAAAAND of course Spidey 3 comes out on April 4th and I'm going to be shooting gooey ropes of my own all over the place. Spidey 2 still holds a burning place in my wee heart, and I can't wait to have another slice of THAT rich cake. Oh.
I'm loving how the golden age of comics movies is coming along, despite the occasional hiccup.
Absolutely FF2 will be an upturn. It's really not within the capacity of human endeavour to make a worse film. And again, despite my better judgment, the trailer got me excited. I still think two out of the five main recurring characters (both Richards and Doom) are horribly miscast, but the Doug Jones/Larry Fishburne double whammy in the form of the Surfer has me interested.
As for Ed Norton's Bruce Banner... Interesting, an certainly closer to the ULTIMATES version. Again, theproblem in that last film (underrated though it is) was the absence of a coherent villain, so the real clincher will be who's going to play Emil Blonsky?
On Venom, I'm disappointed that they didn't go the obvious route with John Jameson, being an astronaut with due reason to hate Parker. That said, I really like that Eddie Brock will be a skinny chinless kid... it's kinda the Peter Parker nerd-gets-powers appeal on the villain side.
Spider-Man 2 filled me so full of goodness that... wait, let me check your page to make sure I've not rambled about this before. ... ...can't find it, but I feel like I have. I'll keep it short. Spider-Man 2's dialogue scenes and character moments were what really locked me- I loved the scene with Aunt May describing why people love heroes, I loved Peter asking "am I not supposed to have what I want," I loved Harry slapping Peter at the part, and I loved LOVED loved Ursula offering Peter a piece of cake. For some reason that's what I talk about the most when I discuss the movie.
I'll be honest though, it kinda creeps me out that she sat there and watched him eat it.
"It's really not within the capacity of human endeavour to make a worse film."
-Let's not abuse hyperbole here. Battlefield Earth, Catwoman. Those are two stone goliaths at the far end, guarding the unkown reaches of bad film. They beat off would-be comers like Ecks vs. Sever and Rubberface. I'd place Fantastic Four well before the cluttered, skull-strewn grounds of worst film ever.
I agree that Doom was incredibly poorly cast. I love that actor in Nip / Tuck, he's unbelievable in a good role. Him as Victor Von Doom was a miscasting as horrid as any in living memory.
Johnny Storm, though, I thought they got just right. Loved that guy, loved the Torch effects.
As far as I'm aware, the Goblin's invovled right through to the finalé, as is Sandman (whose looking like the most accurate page-to-screen villain yet). I have seen from the trailers that in the aftermath of the initial "engagement ring" conflict the "dark" Peter hands Harry his ass, giving him a pumpkin bomb in the face. Perhaps this means a fully-masked costume follows?
You had indeed gone on record with your Spider-Man2 love, and I'd have to say it's the most satisfying of all the Marvel films so far. Disappointed they had to kill the villain, but otherwise great (and refreshingly free of the post-9/11 schmaltz that nearly derailed the first chapter).
Again we concur- Johnny Storm is far and away the best thing in the first Fan4 flick, not that there's much to praise there. Unlike some, I liked their realisation of the Thing and maintain that post-Hellboy he needn't be fully cgi (althought they could have at least Photoshopped out some of the creases on his neck). That's even more important when you have the Torch, Mr Fantastic, Invivible Chick and 'Surfer all computering about around him. The Thing has to have real, palpable weight. He literally and figuratively grounds the group.